|
Goalkeeper saves percentage
| # | Team | Gms. | Saves | % |
|---|
| 1. | Telekom Veszprem | 13 | 18/41 | 43,90 |
| 2. | Metaloplastika | 12 | 23/59 | 38,98 |
| 3. | Nexe | 14 | 28/75 | 37,33 |
| 4. | Meshkov Brest | 16 | 30/87 | 34,48 |
| 5. | Eurofarm Pelister | 12 | 23/67 | 34,33 |
| 6. | Vojvodina | 13 | 27/79 | 34,18 |
| 7. | Vardar 1961 | 14 | 14/49 | 28,57 |
| 8. | PPD Zagreb | 14 | 21/74 | 28,38 |
| 9. | Spartak Moscow | 12 | 21/82 | 25,61 |
| 10. | Tatran Prešov | 14 | 21/89 | 23,60 |
| 11. | Motor Zaporozhye | 12 | 9/44 | 20,45 |
| 12. | Beijing Sport University | 12 | 17/97 | 17,53 |
|
Saves average
| # | Team | Gms. | Saves | Avg. |
|---|
| 1. | Vojvodina | 13 | 27 | 2,08 |
| 2. | Nexe | 14 | 28 | 2,00 |
| 3. | Metaloplastika | 12 | 23 | 1,92 |
| 4. | Eurofarm Pelister | 12 | 23 | 1,92 |
| 5. | Meshkov Brest | 16 | 30 | 1,88 |
| 6. | Spartak Moscow | 12 | 21 | 1,75 |
| 7. | PPD Zagreb | 14 | 21 | 1,50 |
| 8. | Tatran Prešov | 14 | 21 | 1,50 |
| 9. | Beijing Sport University | 12 | 17 | 1,42 |
| 10. | Telekom Veszprem | 13 | 18 | 1,38 |
| 11. | Vardar 1961 | 14 | 14 | 1,00 |
| 12. | Motor Zaporozhye | 12 | 9 | 0,75 |
|
Shot attempts allowed
| # | Team | Gms. | Att.all. | Avg. |
|---|
| 1. | Beijing Sport University | 12 | 97 | 8,08 |
| 2. | Spartak Moscow | 12 | 82 | 6,83 |
| 3. | Tatran Prešov | 14 | 89 | 6,36 |
| 4. | Vojvodina | 13 | 79 | 6,08 |
| 5. | Eurofarm Pelister | 12 | 67 | 5,58 |
| 6. | Meshkov Brest | 16 | 87 | 5,44 |
| 7. | Nexe | 14 | 75 | 5,36 |
| 8. | PPD Zagreb | 14 | 74 | 5,29 |
| 9. | Metaloplastika | 12 | 59 | 4,92 |
| 10. | Motor Zaporozhye | 12 | 44 | 3,67 |
| 11. | Vardar 1961 | 14 | 49 | 3,50 |
| 12. | Telekom Veszprem | 13 | 41 | 3,15 |
|